preloader
Scroll to top
Understanding the City - 2025

Urban Open Spaces – multi-scalar reading from city to the plots

  • Tags

    Cept University, masters in planning, Foundation studio, per capita, Urban Open Spaces, Per-capita Open Space, Town Planning Schemes, Common Open Plots, GIS Mapping

Urban Open Spaces: Presenting a multi-scalar reading from city to the plots | Unit 6 (Final Synthesis Study)


Tutor:
Mansi ShahTA: Anshita Gupta
Students: 
Aadya Bhargava, Jon Mcklein S, Tanvi Udeshi, Aarav Arora, Tanya Jain, Shrinivas Patil, Kartikeya Kathar, Pranjal Hingwe, Sakshi Jain, Ruchita Mahajan, Vaishnavi Kumbhar, Prateek Routray, Sudeep Srivastava, Sai Bhargav Varada

This work presents a multiscalar study of Urban Open Spaces in Ahmedabad, examining how open space is distributed, allocated, implemented, and experienced across three levels—City, Town Planning Scheme (TPS), and Plot. The study began with field observation and GIS mapping of 156 precincts (1 sq. km), from which 16 precincts were selected for detailed analysis. At the city scale, mapping and service-area analysis reveal a very low provision of public open space (~0.5 sqm per person) and an unequal East–West distribution. At the TPS scale, the work compares proposed and implemented open spaces across selected schemes, highlighting gaps between reservation and delivery. At the plot scale, it documents Common Open Plots (COPs) and their varied on-ground uses.

 

This work by Unit 6 students presents a multi-scalar study of Urban Open Spaces in Ahmedabad, examining how open space is distributed, allocated, implemented, and experienced across three levels – City, Town Planning Scheme (TPS), and Plot. Beginning with field mapping of 156 precincts (1 sq. km) and selection of 16 representative precincts, the study identifies a critical mismatch between overall open land and publicly accessible recreational open space.

At the city scale, GIS mapping and service-area analysis reveal an extremely low provision of public open space—~0.5 sqm per person—along with unequal distribution across East and West Ahmedabad. At the TPS scale, the work evaluates proposed versus implemented open spaces across selected schemes, highlighting gaps between reservation and delivery, and the resulting impacts on proximity, density, and surface temperature. At the plot scale, the study examines Common Open Plots (COPs) within private developments and finds that while COPs hold potential as meaningful green/social spaces, many are underutilised or converted to parking and residual uses.

By reading the city through these interlinked layers of governance and ground realities, the work frames open space not only as a design concern, but as a structural and policy question—one tied to equity, thermal comfort, and ecological resilience. It concludes with recommendations for stronger classification, implementation, and ecological integration of open spaces, including protection of wetlands, riparian edges, and low-lying buffers as essential urban systems.